Archive for August, 2009
Friday, August 28th, 2009
¬†¬†¬†¬† The following piece, by Douglas Joshua Davis, appeared in the February issue of The Order of the Earth:¬† News, Views, and Musings About Our Planet.¬† I invite you to try what Mother Earth suggests here.¬† And I would be delighted to hear¬†any experiences you have to report.–April Moore¬†
¬†¬†¬†¬† Lie flat on the ground and feel what I am all about!¬†
¬†¬†¬†¬† So many of you think you know me in an intellectual way, by reading about me or discussing me;¬† but, what you don’t know is how I feel.¬† And if you lie still on the ground you will come to know me.¬† There is to be no talking, no thinking, just lying and listening and hearing me–and feeling what I have to say!
¬†¬†¬†¬† Deep within me lies a secret.¬† Go deep within me through your heart, not your mind.¬† What do you feel there, what does your heart tell you?¬† Yes, there is life!¬† There is life all through me and within me.¬† Sacred Life!¬† There are Earth beings of all shapes and sizes–rock spirits and plant devas and beautiful ones who hold me together and make my life possible.
¬†¬†¬†¬† Wake up!¬† Wake up, humans, to the life within me and to the love¬†I have for you despite what you do to me.¬† What you do to me you do to yourselves.¬† Wake up to who I am and honor me and celebrate me.¬† Life is alive!¬† I am alive!¬† I am sacred;¬† all life is sacred.
¬†¬†¬†¬† There are beings of life and light within the plants, the rocks, who wish to communicate with you, if you are ready.¬† Most of all, they desire to be recognized and respected.¬† Yes, they are real.¬† Your eyes may not see them, but your heart will.¬† You can do everything¬†with your heart.
¬†¬†¬†¬† When you feel my being and touch my soul, when you listen to the message of the wind as it blows through the trees ands when you hear with your heart my pulse, you will know me.¬† You will then, yourself, beat with a different tone, a higher state of vibration, and you will shine with a new light.
¬†¬†¬†¬† What is the order of the Earth?¬† It is Balance¬†and Love.¬† When all beings and systems are in balance, so am I.¬† When love and respect exist for me and between the humans, I am in¬†very good order!
Tuesday, August 25th, 2009
¬†¬†¬†¬† More than 300 species of animals and plants have been discovered in the Eastern Himalayas.¬† “New” mammals, fish, amphibians, birds, and plants have been added to the known list of organisms in the¬†area, underlining the fact that this rugged, mountainous region¬†of Asia is one of the most biologically rich places on earth.
¬†¬†¬†¬† The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) announced recently that over the last decade,¬†350 new species have been discovered in the region that includes Tibet, Nepal, Bhutan, northeastern India, and the far north of Burma.¬†¬†
¬†¬†¬†¬† Among the discoveries is the tiniest species of deer ever known, the leaf deer.¬† Initially thought to be a juvenile of another deer species, the adult leaf deer reaches a height of just 25-30 inches and weighs only about 24 pounds.¬†
¬†¬†¬†¬† Also discovered was a bright green frog which “flies” through the air, thanks to its webbed feet.¬† And the first ‘new’ monkey species in more than¬†100 years, the Arunchal macaque, was also discovered .¬† A bird whose habitat appears to consist of a single square mile, at an altitude of 6,500-7,700 feet, was also¬†discovered.¬† It has been named the Asian Babbler.¬† Then there is a catfish with a unique adhesive on its underside that allows it to stick to rocks in fast-moving streams.¬†¬†
¬†¬†¬†¬† A profusion of plants has also been discovered–species of¬†poppy, orchid, and bamboo among them.
¬†¬†¬†¬† “These exciting finds¬†reinforce just how little we know about the world around us,” says Mark Wright, WWF’s conservation science advisor.¬† Further study of the eastern Himalayas would no doubt identify far more new species, according to Bittu Saghal, editor of Sanctuary Asia, a wildlife and environment magazine published in Asia.
¬†¬†¬†¬† While the eastern Himalayas are one of the most diverse areas on earth, the region is also among the most vulnerable to impacts from global warming, as evidenced by rapidly retreating glaciers.¬† “Only time will tell how well species will be able to adapt–if at all,” says Wright.
¬†¬†¬†¬† The WWF¬†is urging the¬†eastern Himalayan nations to work together for a region-wide vision of conservation and sustainable development.¬† WWF also calls on¬†the¬†governments who will be¬†attending the climate change talks in Copenhagen this December to commit to carbon emission¬†reductions of 40% below 1990 levels¬†by 2020.
¬†¬†¬†¬† “There is no room for compromise on this issue,” says¬†Wright.¬† “Without these cuts, the¬†Himalayas face a precarious future.”–April Moore
Friday, August 21st, 2009
¬†¬†¬†¬† Summer is saying a long good-bye.¬†¬†Even though it is not yet the end of August,¬†her departure is beginning.¬†
¬†¬†¬†¬† These days the cicadas do not limit their ‘song’ to the¬†night time.¬† During the day as well,¬†I hear the cicadas’ agreeable, screeching notes.¬† They emerge out of a sunny drowse and build.¬†¬†Then¬†soon the chorus fades away or stops abruptly.¬† And after a short break,¬†the song¬†begins to grow¬†again.¬† What it means when cicadas sing in the daytime I don’t know.¬† But it’s a sound I associate with the waning of summer.¬†
¬†¬†¬†¬† Some of the trees are already changing their look.¬†¬†The tupelo, still dressed mostly in its solid summer green,¬†is¬†now sporting three bright orange leaves at the tip of a single¬†slender branch.¬† These three¬†are the trailblazers,¬†hinting at the orange¬†soon to¬†envelop the entire tree.¬†¬†The red maples, too,¬†have aged over the last couple of months.¬† Their delicate baby green leaves have¬†toughened and¬†dulled.¬† Some are pocked and torn.¬† And the corkscrew willow has incorporated some curly yellow leaves into¬†the curly green ones.
¬†¬†¬†¬† And when did the berries appear?¬†Without my noticing it,¬†pale green serviceberries have formed, each at the tip of a long, sturdy¬†stem,¬† from the branches of these slight trees.¬† It won’t be long before the these berries turn dark and¬†soft, and beckon the birds and squirrels to a tasty¬†treat.
¬†¬†¬†¬† Speaking of fruit,¬†the crabapple tree is¬†almost completely¬†its autumnal self.¬† The little¬†apples are a deep, showy¬†red, and I can¬† picture the greedy pileated woodpecker who will soon discover them, weighing down entire branches in its determination to get at the tart little¬†fruits.
¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†I glance at one of¬†the pear trees and am surprised to see a large green pear peeking out from a camouflage of¬†leaves.¬† Then I really look and notice¬†at least five more pears.¬† They were visible only because I stopped for a hard look, so well do they blend with the leaves.¬†
¬†¬†¬†¬† The smells have also begun to change.¬† How I wish I knew what plant it is that exudes that sweet, late summer¬†smell.¬† I am smelling it these days, wafting up from the ground, sweet and fragrant in the August sunshine.
¬†¬†¬†¬† Buddhists talk about the importance of¬†letting go, of not clinging to what is, for change is the nature of all.¬†¬†And while I know that I will¬†love the beauties September has in store, the passage of summer¬†always makes me melancholy.¬† I do want to hang onto this season.¬† I¬†don’t want to let it go.¬† But as with all beauty, summer’s brief existence makes it all the more achingly beautiful.–April Moore
Tuesday, August 18th, 2009
¬†¬†¬†¬† Foregoing plastic bags at the grocery and other stores is not a new idea.¬†¬† By now we’ve all learned that plastic is made from petroleum, a finite resource, and that the ubiquitous bags make their way into our waterways¬† and the digestive systems of many¬†animals.¬†
¬†¬†¬†¬† But the extent of plastic bags’¬† impact¬†is shocking.¬†¬†I invite you to read the following 10 facts about plastic bags and to continue on to the ‘What You Can Do’ section at the end.¬† There’s more you can do than you might think.
A few facts:
- Well over a billion single-use plastic bags are given out every day.¬† Americans throw away about 100 billion of these bags per year, the equivalent of about 12 million barrels of oil.
- The production of plastic bags requires petroleum and sometimes natural gas.¬† Both are finite resources.¬† Prospecting and drilling for these resources contributes to the destruction of fragile habitats and ecosystems around the world.
- The manufacture of plastic bags adds many tons of carbon emissions to the atmosphere every year.
- Hundreds of thousands of sea turtles, whales and other marine mammals die every year from eating discarded plastic bags mistaken for food. Turtles think the bags are jellyfish, their primary food source. Once swallowed, plastic bags choke animals or block their intestines, leading to an agonizing death.
- On land, many cows, goats, and other animals also suffer and die from accidentally ingesting plastic bags¬†while foraging for food.¬†
- All the plastic bags that have ever been made still exist.¬† They never ‘biodegrade.’¬† Instead, they¬†’photodegrade,’ breaking into smaller and smaller pieces. ¬†In the oceans, the plastic breaks down into such small pieces “that they can be consumed by the smallest marine life at the base of the food web,”¬†according to a report by the United Nations Environment Programme.¬†
- Only about 1 percent of plastic bags are recycled around the world.¬† In the U.S., we recycle 2 percent of them.
- While many plastic bags will likely spend thousands of years in landfills, the bags are so aerodynamic that many, even if disposed of properly, blow away,¬†clogging storm drains and washing into rivers and bays, eventually finding their way into oceans.
- Bits of plastic bags have been found in the nests of albatrosses in the remote Midway Islands of the Pacific Ocean.
- In the Pacific Ocean, about 800 miles north of the Hawaiian Islands, is a swirling mass of trash, much of it made of plastic bags.¬† This ocean¬†dump is about twice the size of Texas.¬† “It’s an endless stream of incessant plastic particles everywhere you look,” says Dr. Marcus Eriksen of the Algalita Marine Research Foundation, which studies plastics in the marine environment.¬† “Fifty or 60 years ago there was no plastic out there.”
¬†¬†¬†¬† Fortunately, some governments are taking action to stem the tide of this terrible legacy we are leaving the planet and its creatures.¬† Ireland, South Africa, Bangladesh, Thailand, and Taiwan, not the countries one usually thinks of as environmental leaders, have banned plastic bags.¬† In¬†Bangladesh, at least, plastic bags posed a¬†serious and possibly immediate¬†danger to humans.¬† Bags had¬†choked drainage systems¬†in this flood-prone country, and so were banned in 2002.
¬†¬†¬†¬† In the U.S. some cities are taking action.¬† San Francisco and Oakland have¬†outlawed the use of plastic bags in large grocery stores and pharmacies.¬†¬†In Seattle,¬†voters are deciding today [voters rejected the 20 cent fee, 58-42%] whether to uphold a decision last year by the mayor and city council to charge shoppers 20 cents for every plastic or paper bag they use in stores.¬† If the¬†decision is upheld, shoppers can simply avoid the fee¬†by¬†using their own bags¬†when they shop.
¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†The United Nations Environment Programme is calling for a worldwide ban on plastic bags.¬†¬† A great idea, I think.¬† When I¬†searched the Web, however, for organizations working for such a ban, I found nothing.¬†¬†If Earth¬†Connection readers know of any such organizations, I would appreciate knowing about them, so I can publicize them here.
¬†¬†¬†¬† In the meantime, there are many things you can do to help,¬†when shopping, at home, and at work.¬† These suggestions come from Bay Nature, a San Francisco area organization.–April Moore
What You Can Do
Bring your own:
- durable reusable bags, baskets, and containers for shopping at all stores
- reusable lightweight cloth bags for produce
- mug or cup for take-out coffee, tea, smoothies, etc.
- reusable storage containers from home for restaurant meal leftovers
- food from home in place of buying takeout
Avoid plastic packaging.
Avoid buying bottled water; the caps are not recyclable and their size and shape increase the likelihood they will end up in the ocean.
Buy products with minimal or truly recyclable packaging:
- beverages and foods in glass containers with metal lids (and reuse the glass containers)
- berries in paper pulp baskets
- meat from the butcher counter and cheese from the deli counter–and ask that they be wrapped in butcher paper or waxed paper
- cream cheese packaged in foil rather than plastic tubs
- margarine in paper-wrapped cubes rather than plastic tubs
- powdered laundry detergent in paper boxes rather than liquid in plastic bottles (but watch out for plastic bags inside the boxes)
- toilet paper packaged in paper
- bar soap instead of liquid soap in plastic bottles
- wine in glass bottles with natural cork rather than plastic stoppers
- pet food and cat litter in paper bags or boxes
- nursery plants in pressed paper rather than plastic pots
Buy in bulk:
- Buy foods like grains, seeds, nuts, beans, flour, pasta, cereal, crackers, cookies, tea, coffee, olives, etc., in bulk, and bring them home in your own containers or durable reusable bags.
- Buy personal care products like shampoo and body lotion in bulk by refilling your own containers (some stores with large bulk sections carry personal care products in bulk).
- Avoid buying individually wrapped or single-serving foods like cheese slices, pudding, juice in boxes, etc.
If you can‘t buy in bulk, buy items in larger quantities to reduce packaging.
Avoid buying disposable plastic products like razors, pens, lighters, diapers, etc.
Buy used items when possible.
Fill your own stainless steel water bottle with tap water instead of buying bottled water.
Make foods from scratch if they usually come packaged in plastic (salsa, applesauce, yogurt, etc.).
Use non-plastic utensils and picnicware:
- glass or paper drinking straws
- metal utensils, plates, and cups for picnics
Use cloth rags and napkins instead of paper towels and paper napkins, which are packaged in plastic.
- leftovers in glass canning jars or other durable, reusable containers
- dry items in waxed paper bags and aluminum foil instead of plastic bags and plastic wrap
- cheeses in an airtight container rather than plastic wrap
- lettuce in a dry, airtight container in the refrigerator
- hardy greens like collards and kale in an airtight container with a damp cloth inside in the refrigerator or in a vase or jar of water on the counter for up to a week
- spinach in an airtight container in the coldest part of the refrigerator
- ripe fruits (including berries) in airtight containers in the refrigerator
- fresh basil in either a vase of water or an airtight container on the counter for a week or more
Use paper bags or no bags at all for garbage disposal. If you must use a plastic garbage bag, choose one with recycled content.
For dish washing and household cleaning, use cloth rags, natural cellulose sponges, and loofa scrubbers instead of paper towels (which are packaged in plastic), synthetic sponges, and plastic scrubbers.
Dispose of dog and cat feces in 100 percent biodegradable bags or wrap them in old newspaper.
When a plastic item breaks, try to repair it instead of buying a new one.
In the Office
Replace plastic products with more sustainable ones:
- paper tape instead of plastic tape
- refillable tape dispensers
- fountain pen (refill with bottled ink)
- printer paper in paper-wrapped reams
- Refill toner cartridges instead of buying new ones.
Upgrade your computer instead of replacing it. And when you must replace it, take the old computer, monitor, keyboard, printer, etc., to an e-waste disposal facility. Plastic computer housings collected in this manner are more often recycled.
In Your Community
Give away rather than throw away plastic items you no longer use.
Pick up plastic litter when you see it in streets and waterways.
Contact retailers and ask them to stock products packaged in non-plastic recyclable and compostable materials.
Contact manufacturers and ask them to use compostable non-plastic packaging or truly recyclable packaging like glass.
Write to your legislators and support bills aimed to reduce plastic in the environment.
Saturday, August 15th, 2009
¬†¬†¬†¬† I thank my friend Elizabeth for forwarding me this video.¬† These four minutes refreshed and moved me, and they might give you a lift as well.–April Moore
Tuesday, August 11th, 2009
¬†¬†¬†¬† A recent court decision is good news for our wild national forest lands and for all of us who love them.¬† Last week the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the Roadless Area Conservation Rule.¬† This Rule, enacted by the Clinton administration,¬†was later overturned¬†by the Bush administration.
¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†The Rule, promulgated in 2001,¬†brought under federal protection millions of undisturbed acres in our national forests.¬† Thanks to the Rule, nearly one-third of our national forest land was put off-limits to logging, road development, and energy exploration.¬†¬†In overturning the Rule, the Bush administration essentially left the fate of these lands¬†to¬†the governments of the states in which the lands are located.¬†
¬†¬†¬†¬† The August 5 court decision¬†”is a huge victory,” notes Michael Francis, director of The Wilderness Society’s national forest program.¬† The decision “reinstates the most popular environmental rule of all time.”¬†¬† The Wilderness Society was one of 20 environmental organizations¬†and four states that brought the case to reinstate the Rule.
¬†¬†¬†¬† Upholding a lower court ruling, the appeals court noted that the Bush administration had violated the National Environmental Policy Act and the Endangered Species Act.¬† The court also said that¬†the Forest Service, under Bush,¬†had acted unreasonably in asserting that overturning the Rule would not affect the environment,¬†threatened and endangered species, and their habitats.¬† Instead, the Roadless Rule, the court emphasized, offered “immeasurable benefits from a conservationist standpoint.”
¬†¬†¬†¬† While environmentalists hail the court decision as a major victory, they admit that it is not the last word.¬† A year ago a Wyoming U.S. District judge issued a permanent injunction against the Roadless Rule.¬† Environmentalists, who are fighting the injunction in court,¬†are urging President Obama to instruct the U.S. Department of Justice to file an appeal.
¬†¬†¬†¬† In any event, the Ninth Circuit Court’s ruling is “a big win for all Americans because we all value these lands for their clean water and air, quality outdoor recreation and important habitat for wildlife,” said Peter Nelson of Defenders of Wildlife.¬† “The Roadless Rule will help to keep these forests strong in the face of global warming, ensuring that our nation’s forests continue to provide these benefits for generations to come.”
Crabtree Falls, George Washington National Forest
Boise National Forest
Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest
Friday, August 7th, 2009
¬†¬†¬†¬† I thank my friend De Herman for sharing her lovely poem about ferns.–April Moore
Harnessing sun, rain, and soil
Gather, in community, every Spring
Form willowy fronds, unfurl,
Reveal the fresh spirited green of youth
And the wonder of Nature’s bounty
Soft and delicate in the warm breeze
Congregate beside the dirt road
Cozy up to moss and lichen
Wave at chipmunks, squirrels, deer
Catch dew drops on a summer morn
And prepare for the cool nights to come
As Summer yields to Autumn
Ferns shed their emerald frocks
And, as a last hurrah, take on new hues
Harvest gold, amber, rust
Before surrendering to first frost, then decay
Resting under the blanket of winter
Year after year
Century upon century
Spiraling through eternity
These ancient plants, bound to Earth time,
Mark their perpetual passage of the seasons
With vitality, simple beauty, and the elegance
Wednesday, August 5th, 2009
¬†¬†¬†¬† Normally, I keep my posts short.¬† Everyone is busy and has limited time for reading.¬† The excerpt below is easily the longest I have ever posted on The Earth Connection.¬† But I found it so fascinating, so moving, that I just couldn’t cut much of it.¬†¬†¬†
¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†While I had read enough about whales over the years to know that they are highly intelligent, feeling creatures, the¬†experiences¬†and research¬†that¬† Charles Siebert describes in his July 12 New York Times article¬†leave me slack-jawed with wonder.¬† These giant creatures are far more similar to humans than scientists had realized.¬† And many grey whales are actively seeking contact with humans.¬†¬†
¬†¬†¬†¬† I highly recommend taking the time to read the piece.¬† But if you can’t, I suggest you scroll to the end and read the last¬† few paragraphs.
¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†I am grateful to John Cochrane for bringing this article to my attention!–April Moore
Whales, we now know, teach and learn. They scheme. They cooperate, and they grieve. They recognize themselves and their friends. They know and fight back against their enemies. And perhaps most stunningly, given all of our transgressions against them, they may even, in certain circumstances, have learned to trust us again.
Whale! Two o‚Äôclock!‚ÄĚ our boatman and guide, Ranulfo Mayoral, shouted one morning in March, steering toward a distant spout of vapor above the clear blue waters of western Baja‚Äôs Laguna San Ignacio, where I‚Äôd gone in hopes of experiencing firsthand this ever-evolving relationship between humans and whales. We had been out in Mayoral‚Äôs 18-foot fishing skiff, or panga, the Dolphin II, for less than 20 minutes ‚ÄĒ myself, a marine mammal behavioralist named Toni Frohoff and a group of three other whale watchers ‚ÄĒ and already we had a number of gray whales in our sights, yet another exhalation appearing now along the Pacific‚Äôs horizon, followed, in turn, by the balletic, sun-glistened flourish of a suddenly upraised tail, or fluke.
They largely elude us, whales, thus their deep allure. The earth‚Äôs most massive creatures, they nevertheless spend the bulk of their lives off in their own element, beyond our ken, about as close as fellow mammals can get to being extraterrestrials. Other than the occasional disoriented stray or the victims of strandings, whales typically visit us only fleetingly, to grab a passing breath of air or, rarer still, when they‚Äôre breaching: spectacular, body-long heaves, the impetus for which still baffles scientists, who have attributed them to everything from sheer exuberance to attempts to shake off body lice. And yet for all of their inherent elusiveness, the gray whales of Baja baffle scientists for the opposite reason: They can‚Äôt seem to get enough of us humans.
When I first contacted Frohoff, a specialist in whale well-being and stress, back in January in Seattle, where she lived at the time, she mentioned that she would soon be heading down to Baja as part of her ongoing research into ‚Äúthe human-whale interactions there.‚ÄĚ Each winter and early spring, gray whales, members of the baleen family (named for the keratin mouth plates through which they filter their food) arrive by the thousands to the warm, placid lagoons off Baja‚Äôs western coast, where the mothers give birth and nurse their calves for two to four months before beginning the migration northward to their feeding grounds in the subpolar waters of the Bering and Chukchi Seas. Typically such child-rearing is a time of intense seclusion and protectiveness among mammalian species, but many of the grays of Baja, Frohoff told me, treat their days of birthing and nursing there as a kind of protracted coming-out party. ‚ÄúIt‚Äôs extraordinary,‚ÄĚ she said. ‚ÄúAt precisely the time when you‚Äôd expect them to be the most defensive, they‚Äôre incredibly social. They‚Äôll come right up to boats, let people touch their faces, give them massages, rub their mouths and tongues.‚ÄĚ
The very notion of sociable, extroverted whales seemed to me at the time an oxymoron. And yet even as Mayoral, our guide, was speeding toward the blow we just sighted that morning, we were being treated to a spectacular breaching display: four consecutive, time-delayed flights of a mother gray‚Äôs 40-foot-long, 30-ton bulk; a performance so exhilarating I couldn‚Äôt believe that Mayoral was suddenly slowing his panga to a sputtering idle. Until, that is, he happened to mention that the very whale we were pursuing was now in fast pursuit of us.
‚ÄúShe‚Äôs coming straight this way,‚ÄĚ Frohoff shouted as she reached for the sound-recording device she has fondly dubbed Fluffy ‚ÄĒ a two-foot-long, cylindrical microphone sheathed in a filtering fleece of shaggy fur ‚ÄĒ and held it off the bow toward a darkening wave of advancing whale.
Among the most ancient of all the whales, grays are also by far the homeliest, their gunmetal bulks encrusted with barnacles and lice and the crisscrossed scars of everything from orca attacks to the blades of boat propellers. Indeed, the mother gray fast approaching us just then looked like one of those sunken Civil War-era submarines and appeared to be just as inert, until she suddenly surfaced right alongside us with a huge, plosive whoosh of air from her blowhole before submerging once more.
Eighteen feet of boat on open seas is in almost any circumstance a tenuous alignment. But to suddenly find yourself in that same small vessel above a fleet, 40-foot-long midsea mastodon ‚ÄĒ one whose fluke alone could, with a cursory flip, send you and your boat soaring skyward ‚ÄĒ is to know the pure, wonderfully edgeless fear of complete acquiescence. I watched, wide-eyed, the soundless slide of that ‚Äúmoving land,‚ÄĚ as Milton once described whales, everywhere beneath our boat, and suddenly felt the whole of myself wanting to go away with her; to hop on for a long ride downward toward some dimly remembered, primordial home.
And then, within moments, the mother was surfacing again off to our stern and doubling back in our direction, but this time with her newborn male in tow: a miniature version of herself ‚ÄĒ if two tons of anything can be referred to as miniature ‚ÄĒ the calf‚Äôs skin still shiny and smooth. The baby gray glided up to the boat‚Äôs edge, and then the whole of his long, hornbill-shaped head was rising up out of the water directly beside me, a huge, ovoid eye slowly opening to take me in. I‚Äôd never felt so beheld in my life.
A FELLOW MAMMAL breaking the boundary of its domain for a long look at you is beguiling in and of itself. Such behavior becomes downright otherworldly, however, when you consider the not-so-distant history of human-whale interactions in the birthing lagoons of Baja. Much like their extinct Atlantic counterparts or the extremely endangered 100 or so western Pacific gray whales that still yearly ply the coastal waters between South Korea and Siberia, eastern Pacific grays were nearly hunted out of existence as recently as 75 years ago. The waters of Laguna San Ignacio once ran red with whale blood each winter and spring, orphaned calves circling whalers‚Äô vessels for days afterward before dying themselves of starvation.
Gray whales, thought by some scientists to live as long as 100 years, were once commonly referred to as ‚Äúhardheaded devil fish‚ÄĚ because of the ferocity with which they would defend themselves and their young, smashing whaling vessels and killing their occupants. A gray-whale hunting ban agreed upon by most of the world‚Äôs whaling nations in 1937, along with the inherent resilience and adaptability of the eastern Pacific gray, has since allowed the species a rather remarkable rebound. Its current population is estimated to be in the range of 18,000, and in 1994 the gray became the first marine mammal to be removed from protection under the federal Endangered Species Act. Still, the question of why present-day gray-whale mothers, some of whom still bear harpoon scars, would take to seeking us out and gently shepherding their young into our arms is a mystery that now captivates whale researchers and watchers alike.
Some marine biologists have dismissed the phenomenon as little more than a reflexive behavior, suggesting that the whales are merely attracted to the sound of the boats‚Äô motors or that they are looking to scratch their lice-ridden and barnacled backs against the boats‚Äô hulls. Still, a combination of anecdotal evidence and recent scientific research into whale biology and behavior suggests that there may something far more compelling going on in the lagoons of Baja each winter and spring. Something, let‚Äôs say, along the lines of that time-worn plot conceit behind many a film, in which the peaceable greetings of alien visitors are tragically rebuffed by human fear and ignorance. Except that in this particular rendition, the aliens keep coming back, trying, perhaps, to give us another chance. To let us, of all species, off the hook.
The story is by now legend in the small fishing villages of Baja and beyond: how on a February morning in 1972, Francisco Mayoral ‚ÄĒ who is known as Pachico and happens to be the father of Ranulfo, the guide on my trip with Frohoff ‚ÄĒ was out in his panga with his partner, Santo Luis Perez, fishing for sea bass when a female gray whale approached their boat. Pachico tried to maneuver away. The whale, however, kept rising up beside them. At one point, she positioned herself directly under the panga. Pachico, Ranulfo told me one night over dinner at our beachside base camp, had no choice but to hold his place and wait for what would come next. ‚ÄúAll he knew,‚ÄĚ Ranulfo recalled of his father, ‚Äúwas that this animal was the boss.‚ÄĚ
Human-whale relations at that time in Laguna San Ignacio were testy at best. Stories circulated about female grays smashing boats and overturning kayaks, and local fishermen and visitors alike were still making a point of steering clear of the devil fish, ever mindful of its fearsome reputation and of the turbulent history of human-whale interactions in San Ignacio and the other birthing lagoons of Baja ‚ÄĒ Bah√≠a Magdalena to the south, Guerrero Negro and Ojo de Liebre to the north.
Ojo de Liebre was once known as Scammon‚Äôs Lagoon, after Charles M. Scammon, the 19th-century whaling captain who first discovered Baja‚Äôs birthing lagoons. A pioneer of modern commercial whaling and the newly emerging field of cetology, Scammon used new shoulder-launched harpoon guns that allowed him to take not only mother grays and their calves but migrating bulls, too, all along the gray‚Äôs coastal migratory route, thus setting the stage for the near extinction of the very species that Scammon himself exhaustively studied and detailed in ‚ÄúThe Marine Mammals of the Northwestern Coast of North America, Together With an Account of the American Whale-Fishery,‚ÄĚ published in 1874, 23 years after ‚ÄúMoby Dick‚ÄĚ and, like it, still considered one of the best books ever written about whales and whaling.
Human-whale relations have long been defined by this stark dualism: manic swings between mythologizing and massacre; between sublime awe and assiduous annihilation, the testimonies of their slayers often permeated with a deep sense of both remorse and respect for the victims. In our earliest cosmologies, the whale loomed so large as to be more or less commensurate with the cosmos, equally vast and unknowable, as hugely fearsome and immeasurable as any god. The very earth was said to be borne upon the back of a whale, one whose writhings caused earthquakes and floods. In ‚ÄúA Thousand and One Nights,‚ÄĚ Sinbad and his crew come at one point upon a pristine island. They set up camp there and light fires to cook their food, only to find themselves suddenly being tossed off and dashed at sea by the violent trembling of the whale they had mistaken for land. Similar tales of mistaken ‚Äúwhale-lands‚ÄĚ recur throughout early literature.
IN A SENSE, the urge to kill the whale was originally rooted as much in a need to conquer and contain the unknown as it was in a need to gather the bounty of its actual flesh and bone. As far back as the first century B.C., a whale skeleton was transported from Palestine to Rome merely for the public to marvel at. This same impulse would persist through the late 19th and early 20th centuries, when ours had become a world lighted, greased and corseted by whale oil and bone. Joe Roman, a biologist at the University of Vermont, recounts in his book ‚ÄúWhale‚ÄĚ that in cities and towns across Europe and the United States, the chemically preserved carcasses of beached whales became wildly popular traveling exhibitions. One blue whale that stranded off the coast of Sweden in the 1860s was converted into a kind of traveling cetological cafe that for years made the rounds of Europe‚Äôs major cities. People would stroll in through the whale‚Äôs opened mouth and have tea inside its belly before re-emerging, Jonah-like, back into the light of day.
By the middle of the 20th century, worldwide stocks of nearly all the earth‚Äôs whale species had been so depleted that the newly formed International Whaling Commission began placing limits and wholesale bans on commercial whaling in the futile hope of saving an industry fast running out of its only resource. Earth‚Äôs oil, meanwhile, had by then more or less obviated our need for the whale‚Äôs, which, because of its inherent resistance to extreme cold, is used now only in the most specialized machinery of, appropriately enough, sea and space exploration: deep-diving subs, Mars and lunar rovers and the Hubble Space Telescope. In the end, our conquest of whales has mirrored that of the very earth we once thought whales symbolized, just as our current regard for both entities now stems, in large part, from an increasing awareness of their finitude and frailty.
Of course, as the mother gray kept circling his boat on that February morning in 1972, the question of whether the grays of Baja had somehow heard the news of our gradual transition from murdering whales to marveling at them was very much on the mind of Pachico Mayoral. ‚ÄúAt one point she went directly under and lifted the boat out of the water,‚ÄĚ Ranulfo, the son, told me. Pachico and his partner were poised there helplessly, like Sinbad and countless other travelers along the ‚Äúwhale road,‚ÄĚ as early Icelanders once referred to the sea.
And then their boat soon settled again, and the mother gray came back around once more, her head popping up out of the water now directly beside Pachico. She remained there for so long, just eyeing him, that Pachico finally reached across and touched her with a finger. And then with his whole hand, the whale holding still there before him, as if basking in the feel of a grasp without malice. ‚ÄúBefore then, everyone went out of our way to avoid the whales,‚ÄĚ Ranulfo told me. ‚ÄúAnd then all of that suddenly changed.‚ÄĚ
It wasn‚Äôt until I got back to our base camp on the day of my first close whale encounter that I could begin to parse what happened in a calm and coherent fashion: the seemingly undeniable fact, for example, that the mother whale‚Äôs first pass that morning was a reconnaissance mission to check out our boat, and us, before offering up her calf for review: his of us and ours of him.
I read before my journey to Baja of what happens to people when they come in contact with a whale, how they tend to go, literally and figuratively, a bit overboard: nearly tipping over boats for a passing touch; spontaneously breaking into song; crying out in ecstasy; or just flat-out crying. Frohoff herself warned me as we were first boarding Dolphin II that morning that she was given to doffing her scientist hat in the presence of a whale, and sure enough, there was Fluffy, her microphone, set down for a moment beneath her seat, Frohoff dangling far out over the boat‚Äôs prow, arms outstretched, cooing and trilling at the approaching mother and calf. Another watcher in our boat began singing Broadway show tunes. I joined in.
A behavioral and wildlife biologist, Frohoff is something of a pioneer in the field of human-cetacean interactions, having begun her career in the early 1980s studying the to and fro between dolphins and people ‚ÄĒ both in captivity, with the then-emerging swim-with-dolphins therapy programs, and in the wild. She currently serves as the research director of TerraMar Research, dedicated to the protection of marine mammals and their ecosystems, and is a founder of its educational offshoot, the Trans-Species Institute. She began observing the extraordinary goings-on with the so-called Friendlies of Baja in the late 1990s.
‚ÄúStudying human-gray whale interactions was a natural progression for me and my work,‚ÄĚ Frohoff told me as we sat up talking one night in base camp, the usually persistent desert winds so still at that moment that we could hear, out in the lagoon, the ethereal sound of whales breathing. ‚ÄúAnd yet even as somebody who has specialized in human-dolphin interactions, I was not prepared for the profound nature of what‚Äôs going on down here. These encounters are highly unique and rare. And there‚Äôs another word for it: it‚Äôs an enigma. Intellectually, it is an enigma as to why gray whales do this, because there‚Äôs a continuity and predictability to these interactions. What we have here are highly sophisticated minds in very unique bodies, living in such a different environment, and yet these whales are approaching us with some frequency for what appears to be sociable tactile contact. And with no food involved.‚ÄĚ
The very coastal existence that has long afforded grays the protective lagoons for giving birth and nursing and the coastline kelp beds in which to feed and shield their young from the assaults of orcas on the journey north, has also, with the rise of human civilization, increasingly exposed them to a gantlet of human-made perils: ship and small-boat traffic as well as various chemical contaminants and forms of noise pollution, including military sonar.
Despite a mysterious die-off between 1998 and 2000, during which several thousand whales perished, the eastern Pacific gray has thus far proved to be one of the few whale-conservation success stories. Hunted to near extinction by whalers in the 1850s and again in the early 1900s with the introduction of so-called floating factories ‚ÄĒ modern whaling vessels that allowed for the immediate on-board flensing and refinement of the carcass ‚ÄĒ the gray-whale population was reduced, according to some estimates, to fewer than 1,000 animals, a small fraction of their current estimated population of 18,000. Nearly all other whale species, by contrast, have been far slower to rebound, with some scientists estimating that none have reached even half of their former numbers.
Indeed, grays have exhibited a degree of resiliency and adaptability that suggests, among other things, that their sociability in Baja is far more than a reflexive, moth-to-flame-like behavior. Elizabeth Alter, a marine biologist at the N.R.D.C., has done research, for example, that indicates that grays have what she describes as ‚Äúa great degree of behavioral flexibility.‚ÄĚ With time and shifting circumstances, they have switched from exclusive bottom-feeding to occasionally foraging higher up in the water column, and they have been able to seek out a variety of different feeding grounds depending on the conditions and obstacles with which they are confronted. A good percentage of the gray-whale population, Alter also says, may have avoided the Baja lagoons during the peak hunting years and found other areas to calve and nurse.
‚ÄúSome naysayers,‚ÄĚ Toni Frohoff told me, ‚Äúmight claim that these whales don‚Äôt have the intelligence to know the difference between the present peaceful climate in the lagoon and what transpired in the past, that they‚Äôre not smart enough to remember that humans can inflict pain and cause death. However, historical evidence, as well as the limited data we do have on these whales, compels us to think otherwise. I mean, there are numerous stories of how they avoid certain areas and learn to stay away from particular trouble spots, as well as the simple fact that they have to be intelligent and have good memories to survive the way they have, especially navigating along their migratory route, which involves not only memory but making quick assessments and decisions that go beyond just instinctual behaviors. So for me the most plausible explanation, without having any data indicating otherwise, is that they‚Äôve now come to consider us as safe in these areas.‚ÄĚ
TO DATE, NO neurological studies of the gray-whale brain have been done. In 2006, however, researchers at Mount Sinai School of Medicine analyzed the brains of two other baleen species ‚ÄĒ humpback and finback whales ‚ÄĒ as well as those of a number of toothed whales like dolphins and killer and sperm whales. The study revealed brain structures surprisingly similar to our own. Some, in fact, contained large concentrations of spindle cells ‚ÄĒ often referred to as the cells that make us human because of their link to higher cognitive functions like self-awareness, a sense of compassion and linguistic expression ‚ÄĒ with the added kick that whales evolved these same highly specialized neurons as many as 15 million years before we humans did, a stunning instance of a phenomenon biologists refer to as parallel evolution.
‚ÄúIn spite of the relative scarcity of information on many cetacean species,‚ÄĚ the Mount Sinai scientists concluded in a report in the November 2006 edition of the journal The Anatomical Record, ‚Äúit is important to note in this context that sperm whales, killer whales and certainly humpback whales exhibit complex social patterns that include intricate communication skills, coalition formation, cooperation, cultural transmission and tool usage.‚ÄĚ They added that it is therefore ‚Äúlikely that some of these abilities‚ÄĚ are related to the comparable complexity in the brain structures of whales and hominids.
The sperm whale, for example, which has the largest brain on earth, weighing as much as 19 pounds, has been found to live in large, elaborately structured societal groups, or clans, that typically number in the tens of thousands and wander over many thousands of miles of ocean. The whales of a clan are not all related, but within each clan there are smaller, close-knit, matriarchal family units. Young whales are raised within an extended, multitiered network of doting female caregivers, including the mother, aunts and grandmothers, who help in the nurturing of babies and, researchers suspect, in teaching them patterns of movement, hunting techniques and communication skills. ‚ÄúIt‚Äôs like they‚Äôre living in these massive, multicultural, undersea societies,‚ÄĚ says Hal Whitehead, a marine biologist at Dalhousie University in Nova Scotia and the world‚Äôs foremost expert on the sperm whale. ‚ÄúIt‚Äôs sort of strange. Really the closest analogy we have for it would be ourselves.‚ÄĚ
Whitehead has even discovered distinct clan dialects using different codas, what he describes as a ‚ÄúMorse code-like pattern of clicks‚ÄĚ that the whales make with their long head cavities and use to communicate with one another over many miles, reinforcing social bonds and declaring clan affiliation. Whitehead, who has been tracking and recording sperm whales around the globe since the early 1980s, has positively identified five distinct clan dialects and studied two extensively. ‚ÄúThe regular clan,‚ÄĚ he told me in a phone conversation from his lab in Nova Scotia, ‚Äúmakes three to eight equally spaced clicks. And then there are the Plus-One clans. They have two to eight clicks and then a pause and an added click at the end, kind of like the Canadian ‚Äėeh.‚Äô We‚Äôve also noticed that these clans ply the water differently. Regular groups move in wiggly tracks closer to shore, while the Plus-Ones swim further from shore in straight lines.‚ÄĚ
Whales display an incredible degree of coordination and cooperation in their efforts. Aaron Thode, an associate research scientist from the Scripps Institution, who was in Baja doing acoustical studies of grays, told me of another project he is involved in, using the latest research tools to gain insights into how whales perceive the world. He showed me an extraordinary video of sperm whales pilfering catch from fishermen‚Äôs lines in Alaska, 50-foot-long, massive-jawed behemoths delicately snatching a single black cod from a longline‚Äôs dangling hook, like an hors d‚Äôoeuvre from a cocktail toothpick. Fishermen are currently losing 5 to 10 percent of their yearly haul and fear the problem could become worse because whales who have mastered the technique are busily teaching it to others. The news seems to be rapidly spreading, as reports of similar fish-snatching are coming in from fishermen all over the world.
Humpback whales, meanwhile, have devised a prime example of what Fred Sharpe, executive director of the Alaska Whale Foundation, has described as ‚Äúcommunal tool use.‚ÄĚ Based on 20 years of observing humpbacks at sea and simulating their behaviors in the laboratory, Sharpe has been able to piece together the humpback‚Äôs rather ingenious fishing strategy. A group of humpbacks will get together and begin herding prey ‚ÄĒ herring, for example ‚ÄĒ toward the sea surface through the use of coordinated hunting calls. A designated leader of the group, meanwhile, will dive beneath the herded fish and emit from its blowhole an intense stream of rising bubbles, essentially forming a tube-shaped net to hold the fish in place. Waiting for the precise moment when the net has fully formed and captured the optimum number of fish, the group then rises as one, mouths agape, toward the surface.
Somehow the more we learn about whales, the more we‚Äôre coming to appreciate the sublimely discomfiting reality that a kind of parallel ‚Äúus‚ÄĚ has long been out there roaming the oceans’ depths, succumbing to our assaults. Indeed, when that baby gray calf bobbed up out of the sea and held there that first morning, staring at me with his huge, slow-blinking eye, it felt to me as if he were taking one impossibly long and quizzical look in the mirror.
I asked Frohoff at one point if, given both the dark past of human-whale interactions in those lagoons and what we‚Äôve now come to know about whale intelligence, there could possibly be some element of knowing forgiveness behind their actions. She took a deep breath and widened her eyes, making it clear that she wanted to be very careful about how she answered such a question.
‚ÄúThose are the kinds of things that for the longest time a scientist wouldn‚Äôt dare consider,‚ÄĚ she said. ‚ÄúBut thank goodness we‚Äôve gone through a kind of cognitive revolution when it comes to studying the intelligence and emotion of other species. In fact, I‚Äôd say now that it is my obligation as a scientist not to discount that possibility. We do have compelling evidence of the experience of grief in cetaceans; and of joy, anger, frustration and distress and self-awareness and tool use; and of protecting not just their young but also their companions from humans and other predators. So these are reasons why something like forgiveness is a possibility. And even if it‚Äôs not that exactly, I believe it‚Äôs something. That there‚Äôs something very potent occurring here from a behavioral and a biological perspective. I mean, I‚Äôd put my career on the line and challenge anybody to say that these whales are not actively soliciting and engaging in a form of communication with humans, both through eye contact and tactile interaction and perhaps acoustically in ways that we have not yet determined. I find the reality of it far more enthralling than all our past whale mythology.‚ÄĚ
ON MY FOURTH and final day in Baja, I set out once more with Frohoff in Ranulfo Mayoral‚Äôs panga. We were well into Hour 2 of our watch that last day when a mother gray suddenly emerged from San Ignacio‚Äôs riled-up waters a short distance off our bow. Having trained my eye somewhat over the previous days, I knew straight off that this was the same mother from my first day‚Äôs encounter because of the telltale markings of her barnacles and orange sea lice, some 400 pounds of which gray whales typically bear upon their bodies all of their adult lives.
The mother gray let out a great exhale before sliding under again, only to re-emerge a moment later, this time with her male calf, who began treating us to such a rollicking display of playful turns and flips we soon dubbed him Little Nut. For the next 30 minutes or so, despite the choppy seas, mother and son repeatedly wove us and our boat into their designs, and then all at once Little Nut popped up directly alongside the boat again and held there. I reached over and touched him on the head, the smooth, shiny, melon-cask of him, dimpled everywhere with stubbles of hair.
Then, as spontaneously as the interaction had been initiated, it was deemed, by the mother at least, over; time to move on to other things. Not, however, before she abruptly decided to admit us into that exclusive club of unwitting whale riders, the many Sinbads and other, real-life seafarers of this world.
‚ÄúShe‚Äôs coming under the boat,‚ÄĚ Mayoral shouted, cutting the engine, and there we suddenly were, borne up on a swelling promontory of whale back, giddily airborne and helpless.
When Little Nut next emerged, the mother let us gently back down. She then thrust the whole of herself between her calf and our boat, and began to shepherd him away. For another 10 minutes or so, the two swam along about 50 yards off and parallel to us, the mother at one point going into a spectacular series of breaches, as if in both great relief and playful salutation, she and Little Nut fully off in their own element now, heading west toward the lagoon‚Äôs mouth and the open Pacific. ‚ÄúThey‚Äôll behave totally differently when they do decide to leave,‚ÄĚ Mayoral said. ‚ÄúIt‚Äôs all business out there. They know they‚Äôre going to be attacked and that they need food. There‚Äôs no time to be friendly.‚ÄĚ
AMONG THE MANY obstacles migrating grays face in the course of their travels, boat traffic has become such a problem that a number of whale researchers are now proposing to establish an official boat-free zone or ‚Äúwhale‚Äôs lane,‚ÄĚ as they call it. From the Icelanders‚Äô ‚Äúwhale‚Äôs road‚ÄĚ to the ‚Äúwhale‚Äôs lane‚ÄĚ ‚ÄĒ a transition that, in many ways, encapsulates the entire arc of our history with whales: from mythologizing to massacre to marveling at and making way for them anew.
At the American Cetacean Society‚Äôs biennial conference in Monterey, Calif., last November, a mixed bag of gray-whale experts, marine biologists, marine paleontologists, geologists and oceanographic researchers participated in a workshop on ‚ÄúGray Whales and Climate Change.‚ÄĚ They proposed that the resiliency and adaptability of gray whales in response to the shifts in their environment made them what‚Äôs known as an indicator species, one whose health and long-term survival prospects are a good reflection of the state of the overall environment in which they live. ‚ÄúWe refer to them now as ‚Äėsentinels of the seas,‚Äô ‚ÄĚ says Steven Swartz, a government marine biologist in Silver Spring, Md., and one of the world‚Äôs foremost experts on gray whales. ‚ÄúTypically, an indicator species is among the smaller creatures in the environment, micro-organisms. But here we have the largest taking on that role. So it is very unique. Gray whales are delaying their southbound migration and spending less time in the breeding lagoons. They‚Äôre expanding their feeding grounds all along their migration route and in the north, and some are even staying in Arctic water over the winter, all of which reflect climate change and changes in the whole ecosystem.‚ÄĚ
Scientists and devout whale watchers alike now keep constant vigil over the movements of gray whales up and down the West Coast, conducting a census of their numbers, watching out for the injured and stranded. By far the best-known stranding incident occurred in January 1997. A 7-day-old, 14-foot-long baby gray whale was found on the beaches of Marina del Rey, Calif., her skull and ribs evident from extreme malnourishment. An army of local volunteers tried to push her back out to sea to rejoin the southerly migration of her fellow grays, but by morning she was found in a nearby channel, listless, near death.
J. J., as the stranded baby was named, was loaded onto a flatbed truck and driven 150 miles south to SeaWorld in San Diego. The plan was to try to nurture J. J. back to health and release her back into the wild, something that had been done only once before with a captive gray whale, GiGi (for Gray Girl) at the same SeaWorld park. Kept in a 40-by-40-foot tank and tube-fed fluids, glucose and antibiotics, J. J. began to rebound. Soon shifting to a formula that included cream, pur√©ed fish and vitamins, intended to approximate a mother‚Äôs milk, and then to a daily intake of up to 500 pounds of everything from krill to squid to sardines, J. J. by her 14th month had grown to be 30 feet long and 18,000 pounds, the largest marine mammal ever in captivity.
Her tenure at SeaWorld proved to be an invaluable learning experience for whale scientists. J. J. would lead researchers to, among other things, a key insight into the gray whale‚Äôs navigational skills. During the first spring of her stay at SeaWorld, J. J. was always found floating off to one side of her pool, and caretakers feared that she was perhaps suffering from boredom and depression. It soon dawned on them, however, that she was facing north, the direction of the gray‚Äôs spring migration. Subsequent necropsies on gray-whale brains revealed that they contain tiny particles of magnetic iron oxide, inner navigational ball bearings of a sort that whir in concert with the earth‚Äôs magnetic fields, guiding the whales toward their Arctic feeding grounds and, in the early winter, back down to Baja‚Äôs birthing lagoons. (Russian scientists, meanwhile, conducted sleep studies on J. J. and found the first definitive evidence that whales do, in fact, dream.)
By March 31, 1998, J. J.‚Äôs scheduled release date, millions around the world were following the story, hoping for the successful release of the largest animal ever to be returned back into the wild. The freeways were closed for J. J.‚Äôs transport to the release spot off San Diego‚Äôs Point Loma, where a construction crane lifted the 31-foot-long, 19,200-pound whale onto the Coast Guard vessel Conifer. Coast Guard helicopters, meanwhile, were out off Point Loma, scanning the seas for any pods of northward migrating grays that J. J. might join up with. Researchers also outfitted J. J. with radio transmitters in hopes of tracking, for the first time, a complete whale migration. The public would be able to log on to the SeaWorld Web site and track J. J.‚Äôs daily progress.
As her huge body was being hoisted with winches and harnesses off of the Conifer‚Äôs deck and then swung out and gently set down into the Pacific, the first question on everyone‚Äôs mind was would J. J. even know which way to swim. She immediately dove out of sight. Two days later, radio contact was lost, the transmitters having likely been scraped off against the ocean‚Äôs bottom.
The last confirmed sighting of J. J. had her not far from the U.S.-Mexico border. She was said to be near a group of migrating grays and heading north. Having been set free without any of the barnacled baggage and telltale scarring of a wild whale‚Äôs travels, J. J. cannot be positively identified. There is no way to confirm, for example, the hopeful rumor that I would hear often during my days in Baja: that J. J. is now among the Friendlies who return each winter to the waters of Laguna San Ignacio.
BACK AT OUR BASE camp that last night, still worked up from the day‚Äôs earlier turn with Little Nut and his mother, I sat up late talking with Mayoral and a number of the other boat guides, or pangeros. We talked that night mostly about the Friendlies and what might be behind their overtures toward us humans.
A distinctive aspect of the new cognitive revolution that Toni Frohoff spoke to me about is that scientific facts, of all things, are now freeing scientists like herself to be more expansive storytellers. The accusation of anthropomorphism ‚ÄĒ of projecting our thoughts and feelings on other animals; of trying to guess at what a whale‚Äôs day might be like, or a chimp‚Äôs or an elephant‚Äôs ‚ÄĒ has been obviated by the increasing evidence that such creatures have parallel days of their own, ones as distinctly intricate and woundable and, ultimately, unknowable as ours. ‚ÄúI don‚Äôt anthropomorphize,‚ÄĚ Frohoff told me. ‚ÄúI leave it to other people to do that. What I do is study gray whales using the same rigorous methodologies that have long been used to study the behaviors of other species and interspecies interaction. Those who would reject out of hand the idea that whales are intelligent enough to consciously interact with us haven‚Äôt spent enough time around whales.‚ÄĚ
The pangeros, for their part, have seen enough remarkable whale behavior to know better than to prejudge any explanation, however mind-bending, for what is going on in the lagoons of Baja. A 25-year-old named Alberto Haro Romero, known as Beto, told me of something he saw a month earlier while kayaking off Cabo San Lucas. A group of southward-migrating gray whales were suddenly surrounded and attacked by a pod of pilot whales. Out of nowhere, a group of humpbacks ‚ÄĒ who, like grays, are baleen whales ‚ÄĒ appeared and began going at the pilot whales, a highly coordinated counterattack. ‚ÄúIt was unbelievable,‚ÄĚ Beto said. ‚ÄúOne baleen whale coming in on the behalf of another. It was, like, tribal.‚ÄĚ
As Beto spoke, I thought of another bit of interspecies cooperation involving humpbacks that I recently read about. A female humpback was spotted in December 2005 east of the Farallon Islands, just off the coast of San Francisco. She was entangled in a web of crab-trap lines, hundreds of yards of nylon rope that had become wrapped around her mouth, torso and tail, the weight of the traps causing her to struggle to stay afloat. A rescue team arrived within a few hours and decided that the only way to save her was to dive in and cut her loose.
For an hour they cut at the lines and rope with curved knives, all the while trying to steer clear of a tail they knew could kill them with one swipe. When the whale was finally freed, the divers said, she swam around them for a time in what appeared to be joyous circles. She then came back and visited with each one of them, nudging them all gently, as if in thanks. The divers said it was the most beautiful experience they ever had. As for the diver who cut free the rope that was entangled in the whale‚Äôs mouth, her huge eye was following him the entire time, and he said that he will never be the same.